[Note that this FAQ is from Joel's point of view, and that Joel was apparently especially cranky the day this was written...] Article 18278 of alt.config: From: jfurr@char.vnet.net (Joel Furr) Newsgroups: alt.config,alt.fan.tim-pierce.control.control.control Subject: Tim Pierce: the Frequently Asked Questions Date: 12 Dec 1993 14:16:39 -0500 Organization: AAA Diety Removal ('If it's all-powerful, we'll get rid of it!') NNTP-Posting-Host: char.vnet.net FAQ: Tim Pierce 1) Who is Tim Pierce? He's the news administrator at Amherst College, up in Massa- chusetts. He's been on the net long enough to consider himself a sage authority on all manner of subjects. 2) Is he a sage authority on all manner of subjects? No. 3) What's his favorite hobby? His favorite hobby is lurking in alt.config and springing on people who have ideas for new newsgroups and telling them why their ideas are totally idiotic and worthy of being buried in sixteen feat of cow manure. He never says any- thing to the real losers who obviously don't know what they're talking about, preferring to save his opinions for those who sort of do and thus may be seen as in some vague way challenging Tim's position as God of alt.config. 4) Is there *anything* that he's right about? If he tells you that it would be a fine idea if no level of your proposed newsgroup name had more than 14 characters (e.g. "alt.transcendentalism" is too long for most news software to deal with, but "alt.snuggling" isn't because no level has more than 14 characters), he's right. On just about all other conceivable issues, he's wrong. 5) I just proposed a new newsgroup in alt.config. Tim told me I should start it first as a mailing list. But I just saw someone who said they had a mailing list that they wanted to turn into a newsgroup because it was getting too big, and Tim said that was bad. What's going on here? This is the Famous Tim Pierce Contradiction Number 1 (see below for Number 2). A mailing list should never be turned into a newsgroup, no matter how big it gets. All proposed alt. groups should start out as mailing lists and only be turned into newsgroups later if they do really well. In other words, ignore him. 6) I just proposed a new newsgroup in one of the Big 7 hierar- chies (comp, misc, soc, talk, news, sci, or rec) and Tim said it should start out as an alt. group instead and then become a Big 7 group if it does really well. But I just saw someone who pro- posed moving an alt. group to a Big 7 group and Tim said that was horribly, unbelievably bad. What's going on here? This is the Famous Tim Pierce Contradiction Number 2 (see above for Number 1). A new newsgroup should start out as an alt. group in order to judge how well it will do and maybe later on move it to a Big 7 group. However, no alt. group should EVER be moved to a Big 7 group because that would be bad. In other words, ignore him. 7) Is Tim mean-spirited and vicious? Yes, but that's normal for USENET and the alt. net. 8) Are ASCII art pictures (e.g. those drawings of Ren and Stimpy you see in people's .sigs) the same thing as binary source files of pornographic GIFs? According to Tim Pierce, they are. Totally and completely. 9) Tim Pierce sounds like a real crank. Yep.