Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,alt.religion.kibology Path: utk.edu!news!washdc3-snf1!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!nntp.abs.net!uunet!ffx.uu.net!world!kibo From: kibo@world.std.com (James "Kibo" Parry) Subject: Re: U.S.PHYSICIST FINDS RELATIVISTIC PROOF OF GOD Sender: news@world.std.com (Mr Usenet Himself) Message-ID: X-Face: $T[.n?/D[sL]Jpd{Jp66*DCPkYZ-oSm9^Xw`v9eZeo`Bt?*2:Eag<1.o@h?wWD5J*]lxl Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:43:28 GMT References: <3873E1DC.CFC405F2@mediaone.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp0b162.std.com Organization: www.kibo.com X-Newsreader: MT-NewsWatcher 2.4.4 Lines: 192 Xref: utk.edu sci.physics.relativity:7413 alt.religion.kibology:4666 In sci.physics.relativity, George Hammond (ghammond@mediaone.net) wrote: > > Its reported frequently in archeology works that Neanderthal > man probably couldn't speak or had limited speaking ability > and that Homo Sapiens could talk. They can? Really? Okay, some of them can, I'll grant you that. But, George, just because you can talk, doesn't make you a Sapiens. > The accuracy of this is of course irrelevant to anyone but a pedant. Yeah, nobody but a pedantophile would care whether you're a Homo Sapiens. PLEASE EXCUSE THE LINE BREAK BUT IT DOES IT AUTOMATICALLY!!! > What ANYTHING is depends on who you are talking to and > what aspect of it you are talking about. To be right up > front, the theory shows that God is a "psychological factor". > The DIRECT CAUSE of God is in fact (despite common ignorance) > well known and has been well known since the time of Moses > and the Pharaohs. In modern terminology it is caused by > "incomplete growth" of the human being... no one ever reaches > their full height and weight. This means the BRAIN never > reaches full size. Because if it did, we'd be crushed under the weight of our own brains! > (all this is due obviously to the historical 'standard > of living'). Anyway, you don't need a physics lab to measure it.. Damn. I was just about to measure the standard of living here in my physics lab. Isn't the ISO standard something about how the average yearly annual income equals 153,620,000 wavelengths of an argon laser? > it can be seen with the naked eye.. PEOPLE, STOP WEARING CLOTHES ON YOUR EYES!!! TAKE OFF YOUR EYE PANTS NOW!!! > its the FIRST THING you notice about a person. > Highly developed (nearly full grown) people lead society > and occupy all the prominent positions, CEO's, Military > Brass, public Officials, Movie Stars, Sports Stars > etc. etc. on the low end of development you get all the > wimps, nerds, basket cases and people like me. I was going to disagree with that but then I read what it said. > What this means, is that this "growth curve deficit" see: > > http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/growth5.JPG > > (at my website) causes everyone to see "less than > reality" simply because 10% of their brain is missing. It certainly is if they've read your Web site carefully. > It also makes you think that there must be a "perfect or > 'normal' person) walking around somewhere. This person > we call "God". Obviously he is latent inside your own > body. OH NO GOD IS A LITTLE LEPRECHAUN WALKING AROUND INSIDE MY OWN BODY! I HOPE HE DOESN'T STEP ON MY INTESTINES! > Now, the object of life is to try and 'grow' this > complete person.. of course nobody ever succeeds in > doing it, thus "..no man hath seen God at any time". > However, this latent undeveloped brain (known as the > unconscious mind BTW) is what "controls" us and > causes our every action, or influences it certainly. > Now, evolutionarily speaking, there is the question > of "knowing" things.. this depends on intelligence. > It is doubtful that a clam "knows" anything. Certainly > a dog or a cat can't speak so they don't "think" in terms > of words like we do. So, at some point in evolution > we became able to "know that there was a God". I > put this at 33 Kyrs B.C. when Homo Sapiens arrived. I was going to elide the word "Kyr" but that could have led to a pun about "Kyrie elision" so instead I'll just elide the next page of text. > [...doo dah dah, doo dah dah...] > > [...oom pah pah, oom pah pah...] > > [...now returning to our program...] > > As you know from crystallography a simple cube has > 13-symmetry axes. (3-normals, 4-body diagonals, > 6-face diagonals = 13) You forgot to count the curved ones that squiggle around in the middle! > THIS, my theory shows, is because the BRAIN IS CUBIC. And you're a chip off the old block. head. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to elide more important text and skip ahead to where this article starts to get stupid. > [...doot doot doot doot doot...] > > It is a mathematical fact that a 4x4 can ONLY HAVE ONE > HIGHER ORDER FACTOR. Therefore, we have proved that > ALL OF PSYCHOLOGY, ends in a SINGLE FACTOR. Moreover, > as the beginning of this letter showed, we KN0W that it > is "Brain Development" that is causing the intercorrelation > of the 4x4 (i.e. WE KNOW HISTORICALLY THAT THE FACTOR IS > CAUSED BY GOD BEFORE WE EVEN FOUND IT). > Now however, WE HAVE ACTUALLY DISCOVERED THAT THERE IS > MATHEMATICALLY AND EXPERIMENTALLY, AN AXIOMATIC LAST > FACTOR. THEREFORE THE CONCLUSION IS THAT IT IS GOD (The > god of the Bible, or the God of history) > FINALLY, since Relativity tells us that the higher order > factor of Einstein spacetime 4x4 Metric is GRAVITY, we > see that Gravity is causing the higher order factor of the > 4x4 Psychometry Metric which is God. THEREFORE GRAVITY > CAUSES GOD. Let me just chalk that up on the blackboard where I'm writing all the contenders for the Nobel Prize For Having A Theory In All Caps: GRAVITY CAUSES GOD!!! <-- George "Cube-Brain" Hammond GOD HAS INERTIA!!! <-- Alexander "Moon Go Boom" Abian GOD IS A PENINSULA!!! <-- Archimedes "I Like Candy" Plutonium GOD IS A SEXY PSYCHIC PLANT!!! <-- Rob't "I'd Buy That For A Dollar" McElwaine PLEASE SEND ME PICTURES OF GOD FLOORING THE ACCELERATOR! PLEASE EXCUSE THE ALL CAPS, GOD DOES IT AUTOMATICALLY!!! <-- Accelerator "Desperate" Boy /\/\\/\\\\_^7i{f34~___--=god?--|||\\/\ <-- Manley "Neuron Salad" Hubbell > Now some will ask "WHAT GRAVITY". WHAT GRAVITY PERIOD. THAT WAS A QUESTION SEMICOLON. YOU'RE WELCOME BOZO. > This is an interesting point. Factor Analysis will not tell > you "what gravity" it only tells you it "is gravity". No, "it" is not gravity. "It" is what must be added to gravy to make gravity. > Apparently it cannot be Terrestrial Gravity, because that > is too weak, and it is a CONSTANT whereas God is a variable > mathematically. And you, sir, are one of those peanuts where you pop it open and it only has half a peanut inside, botanically. > Sir Roger Penrose has suggested (Shadows of the mind 1994) > that it is "Quantum Gravity" in the Brain that is collapsing > the QM wavefunction of mental operation. OBVIOUSLY THEN, > what we have discovered is PENROSE'S BRAIN GRAVITY. Excuse me, you're misreading your instruments. You're measuring John Pinette's gravity. > This scientific result is the ONLY KNOWN EXPERIMENTAL > CONFIRMATION OF PENROSE'S BRAIN GRAVITY THEORY. > FINALLY, OF COURSE...... IT IS THE SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD. > (see my website, below) NO PROOF OF GOD HAS EVER BEEN ON THE WEB BEFORE! IT MUST BE TRUE! > ----------------------------------------------------------- > George Hammond, M.S. Physics > Email: ghammond@mediaone.net > Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html > ----------------------------------------------------------- And Robert McElwaine only has a B.S. so you must be a little saner than he is. -- K. Excuse me while I spell-check this article to make sure I called you a "chip off the old block" and not "chimp off the old block." Then wait another moment while I consider changing it.